<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>CCIE Pilot</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cciepilot.wordpress.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cciepilot.wordpress.com</link>
	<description>CCIE success is going from failure to failure without losing enthusiasm.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 May 2010 23:50:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
<cloud domain='cciepilot.wordpress.com' port='80' path='/?rsscloud=notify' registerProcedure='' protocol='http-post' />

	<atom:link rel="search" type="application/opensearchdescription+xml" href="http://cciepilot.wordpress.com/osd.xml" title="CCIE Pilot" />
	<atom:link rel='hub' href='http://cciepilot.wordpress.com/?pushpress=hub'/>
		<item>
		<title>CCIE Employer Information</title>
		<link>http://cciepilot.wordpress.com/2010/04/29/ccie-employer-information/</link>
		<comments>http://cciepilot.wordpress.com/2010/04/29/ccie-employer-information/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Apr 2010 16:55:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mar Apuhin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CCIE]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cciepilot.wordpress.com/?p=429</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Cisco introduced CCIE in 1993 to help individuals, companies, industries and countries succeed in the networked world, by distinguishing the top echelon of internetworking experts. Today the CCIE program sets the standard for internetworking expertise and evolves with the industry. The CCIE program is committed to valid, fair and high quality exams. What CCIE certification [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=cciepilot.wordpress.com&blog=3927944&post=429&subd=cciepilot&ref=&feed=1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cciepilot.wordpress.com/2010/04/29/ccie-employer-information/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">CCIE Pilot</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://tracker.omnis.com/image.php?name=cciepilot;adid=ccie_pilot;image=7" medium="image" />
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>CCIE4.0-IPv6 Multicast – Multicast Listener Discovery (MLD)</title>
		<link>http://cciepilot.wordpress.com/2010/04/27/ccie4-0-ipv6-multicast-%e2%80%93-multicast-listener-discovery-mld/</link>
		<comments>http://cciepilot.wordpress.com/2010/04/27/ccie4-0-ipv6-multicast-%e2%80%93-multicast-listener-discovery-mld/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Apr 2010 23:36:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mar Apuhin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[IPv6]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cciepilot.wordpress.com/2010/04/27/ccie4-0-ipv6-multicast-%e2%80%93-multicast-listener-discovery-mld/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[IPv6 multicast renames IGMP to the Multicast Listener Discovery Protocol (MLP). Version 1 of MLD is similar to IGMP Version 2, while Version 2 of MLD is similar to Version 3 IGMP. As such, MLD Version 2 Source Specific Multicast (SSM) for IPv6 environments. Using MLD, hosts can indicate they want to receive multicast transmissions [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=cciepilot.wordpress.com&blog=3927944&post=399&subd=cciepilot&ref=&feed=1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cciepilot.wordpress.com/2010/04/27/ccie4-0-ipv6-multicast-%e2%80%93-multicast-listener-discovery-mld/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">CCIE Pilot</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Internetwork Expert’s R&amp;S Lab Workbook Volume IV Logs – Lab 6 of 10</title>
		<link>http://cciepilot.wordpress.com/2010/04/21/lab-6-volume-4-ine-com-logs/</link>
		<comments>http://cciepilot.wordpress.com/2010/04/21/lab-6-volume-4-ine-com-logs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Apr 2010 09:36:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mar Apuhin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Troubleshooting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VOL4]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cciepilot.wordpress.com/?p=374</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lab 6 Volume 4 by: CCIE Pilot Ticket 1: EIGRP The slower EIGRP link via the FR cloud been used. There is an optimal path via port-channel between SW3 and SW3 found to be down. The fix of this issue is related to port-channel. Per Etherchannel tunneling rules, you need to have a single separate [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=cciepilot.wordpress.com&blog=3927944&post=374&subd=cciepilot&ref=&feed=1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cciepilot.wordpress.com/2010/04/21/lab-6-volume-4-ine-com-logs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">CCIE Pilot</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Internetwork Expert’s R&amp;S Lab Workbook Volume IV Logs – Lab 5 of 10</title>
		<link>http://cciepilot.wordpress.com/2010/04/14/internetwork-expert%e2%80%99s-rs-lab-workbook-volume-iv-logs-%e2%80%93-lab-5-of-10/</link>
		<comments>http://cciepilot.wordpress.com/2010/04/14/internetwork-expert%e2%80%99s-rs-lab-workbook-volume-iv-logs-%e2%80%93-lab-5-of-10/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Apr 2010 04:53:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mar Apuhin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Troubleshooting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VOL4]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cciepilot.wordpress.com/?p=371</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lab 5 Volume 4 Ticket 1: OSPF -Case related to dot1q tunneling between 2 indirectly connected devices. -Make sure the dot1q tunnel port has and access vlan assignment and l2protocol-tunnel allowed. -Do the usual OSPF routine checking. -This case is not actually related to OSPF. Interface f0/x switchport access vlan 100 switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=cciepilot.wordpress.com&blog=3927944&post=371&subd=cciepilot&ref=&feed=1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cciepilot.wordpress.com/2010/04/14/internetwork-expert%e2%80%99s-rs-lab-workbook-volume-iv-logs-%e2%80%93-lab-5-of-10/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">CCIE Pilot</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Expansion of Routing and Switching Lab v4.0 Blueprint</title>
		<link>http://cciepilot.wordpress.com/2010/03/29/expansion-of-routing-and-switching-lab-v4-0-blueprint/</link>
		<comments>http://cciepilot.wordpress.com/2010/03/29/expansion-of-routing-and-switching-lab-v4-0-blueprint/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Mar 2010 17:54:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mar Apuhin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CCIE]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cciepilot.wordpress.com/?p=366</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Detailed Checklist of Topics to Be Covered &#8211; Routing and Switching (Expanded by Cisco). Please be advised that this topic checklist is not an all-inclusive list of Cisco CCIE Routing and Switching lab exam subjects. Instead, Cisco provides this outline as a supplement to the existing lab blueprint to help candidates prepare for their lab [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=cciepilot.wordpress.com&blog=3927944&post=366&subd=cciepilot&ref=&feed=1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cciepilot.wordpress.com/2010/03/29/expansion-of-routing-and-switching-lab-v4-0-blueprint/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">CCIE Pilot</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Internetwork Expert’s R&amp;S Lab Workbook Volume IV Logs – Lab 4 of 10</title>
		<link>http://cciepilot.wordpress.com/2010/03/25/internetwork-expert%e2%80%99s-rs-lab-workbook-volume-iv-logs-%e2%80%93-lab-4-of-10/</link>
		<comments>http://cciepilot.wordpress.com/2010/03/25/internetwork-expert%e2%80%99s-rs-lab-workbook-volume-iv-logs-%e2%80%93-lab-4-of-10/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2010 03:03:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mar Apuhin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Troubleshooting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VOL4]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cciepilot.wordpress.com/?p=360</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[10:24 PM 3/16-25/2010 HKT (Redo) Trouble Ticket 1: RIPV 2 -Do not discount VLAN filter in trouble shooting IP connectivity. -Use CDP, trace spanning tree for the VLAN in question. -Logging should be on to console. -Always verify after putting the configuration or fix. -Use CDP -Ping test using source. -Test if related to any [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=cciepilot.wordpress.com&blog=3927944&post=360&subd=cciepilot&ref=&feed=1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cciepilot.wordpress.com/2010/03/25/internetwork-expert%e2%80%99s-rs-lab-workbook-volume-iv-logs-%e2%80%93-lab-4-of-10/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">CCIE Pilot</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Understanding MSTP</title>
		<link>http://cciepilot.wordpress.com/2010/03/17/understanding-mstp/</link>
		<comments>http://cciepilot.wordpress.com/2010/03/17/understanding-mstp/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 00:02:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mar Apuhin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CCIE]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cciepilot.wordpress.com/?p=355</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Petr Lapukhov wrote a great (and very long) article describing MSTP. It covers everything, from the basics to multi-region design and interoperability issues. Highly recommended reading. Filed under: CCIE<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=cciepilot.wordpress.com&blog=3927944&post=355&subd=cciepilot&ref=&feed=1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cciepilot.wordpress.com/2010/03/17/understanding-mstp/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">CCIE Pilot</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Internetwork Expert’s R&amp;S Lab Workbook Volume IV Logs – Lab 3 of 10</title>
		<link>http://cciepilot.wordpress.com/2010/03/08/internetwork-expert%e2%80%99s-rs-lab-workbook-volume-iv-logs-%e2%80%93-lab-3-of-10/</link>
		<comments>http://cciepilot.wordpress.com/2010/03/08/internetwork-expert%e2%80%99s-rs-lab-workbook-volume-iv-logs-%e2%80%93-lab-3-of-10/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 06:32:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mar Apuhin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Troubleshooting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VOL4]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cciepilot.wordpress.com/?p=351</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[11:01 AM 3/7/2010 HKT LAB 3 VOLUME 4 Notes: Ticket 1 &#8211; RIPv2 • Fix the issue preventing R6 from learning RIPv2 prefixes from BB1. • Do not change the IP addressing on R6 to resolve this problem. -Know the scope of the problem. -Check RIP running config first. Check interfaces running RIP. -Check interface [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=cciepilot.wordpress.com&blog=3927944&post=351&subd=cciepilot&ref=&feed=1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cciepilot.wordpress.com/2010/03/08/internetwork-expert%e2%80%99s-rs-lab-workbook-volume-iv-logs-%e2%80%93-lab-3-of-10/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">CCIE Pilot</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>How the bgp deterministic-med Command Differs from the bgp always-compare-med Command</title>
		<link>http://cciepilot.wordpress.com/2010/02/24/how-the-bgp-deterministic-med-command-differs-from-the-bgp-always-compare-med-command-2/</link>
		<comments>http://cciepilot.wordpress.com/2010/02/24/how-the-bgp-deterministic-med-command-differs-from-the-bgp-always-compare-med-command-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 03:03:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mar Apuhin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CCIE]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cciepilot.wordpress.com/2010/02/24/how-the-bgp-deterministic-med-command-differs-from-the-bgp-always-compare-med-command-2/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Introduction There is sometimes confusion between the two Border Gateway Protocol (BGP) configuration commands bgp deterministic-med and bgp always-compare-med. This document explains the differences in how the bgp deterministic-med and bgp always-compare-med commands can affect Multi Exit Discriminator (MED)-based path selection and how each command changes the behavior of BGP when choosing a best route. [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=cciepilot.wordpress.com&blog=3927944&post=350&subd=cciepilot&ref=&feed=1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cciepilot.wordpress.com/2010/02/24/how-the-bgp-deterministic-med-command-differs-from-the-bgp-always-compare-med-command-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">CCIE Pilot</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Featured Article: Flexible Packet Matching</title>
		<link>http://cciepilot.wordpress.com/2010/02/24/featured-article-flexible-packet-matching/</link>
		<comments>http://cciepilot.wordpress.com/2010/02/24/featured-article-flexible-packet-matching/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 23:45:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mar Apuhin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CCIE]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cciepilot.wordpress.com/2010/02/24/featured-article-flexible-packet-matching/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Featured Article: Flexible Packet Matching By Steve Means One of the issues facing network and security engineers is defending the network against dynamic threats. This means traffic that cannot easily be identified by regular means, such as an application that changes layer 4 ports or tunnels within an existing protocol. Because of this, a solution [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=cciepilot.wordpress.com&blog=3927944&post=349&subd=cciepilot&ref=&feed=1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cciepilot.wordpress.com/2010/02/24/featured-article-flexible-packet-matching/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">CCIE Pilot</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>